Hello Everyone,
This is the monthly communication for December 2021. The general lodge meeting will take place on Wednesday, December 1st, 2021. I do not expect any motion to spend more than one hundred dollars for this meeting. As I previously communicated, the nomination of local lodge officers took place on November 3rd, 2021 and each open position only had one nominee (except for Conductor/Sentinel which had no nominee), therefore no election is needed. The new officers will be installed at the January 5th, 2022 general lodge meeting. The general lodge meeting for December will take place in person at 5:15PM, at the local lodge hall, building 4313, street address 6483 Integrity Ct. (behind CAC Card and badging offices). At this point indoor mask mandate will still apply to this meeting. I hope more members attend.
The lodge officers were notified by mail that the union dues will increase in 2022 for the two levels of the IAM&AW organization above our local lodge by three dollars and twelve cents per month ($3.12/mo). My intention is to discuss this with the executive board prior to the meeting on Wednesday and see if we can come up with a way to absorb some of that increase at the local lodge level. At this point I cannot promise what the increase will be, but I do not see the local lodge needing to add to that increased amount. And hopefully we can find a way to reduce that amount without impacting our yearly budget. We appear to be in a range that dues could increase by an amount not to exceed one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per paycheck for those paid biweekly. Hopefully we can cut that down more than that. Members that pay dues bi monthly or monthly will see rates above that rough estimate, only because they do not pay dues 26 times per year. More information will be provided at the meeting.
Again, what can I say about the vaccine policy rollout? It has shifted yet again from the December 9th deadline to a point later in January 2022. At this point all I can say as a leader is that I am guessing about the future and that can cause serious turmoil, so I probably need to repeat my previous advice and stay out of the policy explanation business. My advice is still to have your own individual plan. Maybe taking the vaccine works for your situation, maybe it does not. It’s an individual situation, and you must plan your choices for your situation. Our lawyers have advised that the employers have the rights to do what they are doing, but the union has the right to bargain about the effects of the policy. “Effects bargaining” could take significant time to resolve. Appeals for reasonable accommodations or other relief from the policy could take significant time. That needs to be accounted for in your plan. Most of you have worked through this pandemic, risking getting sick, and deserve respect for handling your job as a professional during this trying time. Those that have taken the vaccine deserve respect, those that are choosing not to are also due respect. We cannot fix that divide because there is not only one solution for the future. I expect we will see the vaccine policy take effect at some point in the future, and I do not think anyone should expect to avoid it forever. Being vaccinated against Covid-19 will be a job requirement at some point, management will probably just juggle the dates around so that few people notice when they do take action against those who decline to get vaccinated. Management has at least three years to create new dates, move the goal line, and re-work the policies. Shifting it around takes the news off the front page, because employees that decline vaccination can be let go in smaller groups to avoid notice. The union can grieve and appeal any unfair job actions, but management will probably use the extra time to develop reasons and protocols to present the “appearance” of fairness to any legal venue we may end up using. I know this is not what some would like to hear from a union that does fight, but this fight is probably decided before anyone steps in the ring. Working on a military installation with the US Government as the customer allows the application of rules to be different here. We do not have the same leverage that police, firefighters, and airline pilots have to fight back.
Now some good news for union members. On November 18th, President Biden signed Executive Order 14055, Non Displacement of Qualified Workers in Service Contracts. It was published in the Federal Register on November 23rd, 2021. It says; “Section 1 . Policy. When a service contract expires, and a follow-on contract is awarded for the same or similar services, the Federal Government’s procurement interests in economy and efficiency are best served when the successor contractor or subcontractor hires the predecessor’s employees, thus avoiding displacement of these employees. Using a carryover work force reduces disruption in the delivery of services during the period of transition between contractors, maintains physical and information security, and provides the Federal Government with the benefits of an experienced and well-trained work force that is familiar with the Federal Government’s personnel, facilities, and requirements. These same benefits are also often realized when a successor contractor or subcontractor performs the same or similar contract work at the same location where the predecessor contract was performed.” To try to explain this in simple terms, President Obama signed a similar Executive Order in 2009, the previous administration revoked that Obama Executive Order in 2019, and now this Executive Order is back with additional language that protects workers, like us, on Service Contract Act (SCA) jobs.
You may hear some noise that the implementation date is after the upcoming contract change over between Trax International and Jacobs Technology – if the contract award protest does not change the outcome. But if you read the executive order guidance in full, all companies doing business with the US Government are encouraged to adopt this policy during the 180 days it normal takes for a rule like this to be enforced. Still to be determined – if the US Government eliminated some needs in the new contract – that would still be allowed, and some workers may not have “similar” jobs available. So it is not an 100% air tight obligation to hire everyone in the entire workforce during a contract change over, but it is as close as they can get with the new language that fixed some of the loopholes in the Obama executive order. I’m sure over the coming years, some members may still be laid off during a change over, do not be surprised. The US Government still wants the ability to make changes in successor contracts, and we cannot prevent that from happening. But hopefully we will no longer see some of the business practices we have seen in a handful of the recent service contract change overs here at APG where companies purposely under bid contracts with layoffs in mind, that they knew would result in later requests to restore the positions after a certain period of time passed. It’s always a game – the refs were just given a new mandate on calling pass interference. We just have be in the game and remind the refs to make the right calls if needed.
To the news that the ATSS contract was awarded to Trax International, ATSS Chief Steward AJ Begunich has already informed ATSS members that a protest was logged. At this point we do not know how long or when that maybe resolved. Once resolved, it is normally a 60 day transition period if Trax is still awarded the contract. We will not know that until we know.
As of the writing of this communication there has been no announcement of negotiations or talks with the CBA’s that expire in 2022. This is normal at this point. I will let you know if we see problems ahead.
That is all for December 2021. We will have more information next month.
Respectfully and Fraternally,
Bill Harkum
President, IAM&AW Local Lodge 2424